Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison with CompostBin on the datasets described in[17]

From: Separating metagenomic short reads into genomes via clustering

Species

Ratio

Phylogenetic

CompostBin’s

TOSS (Sanger)

TOSS (Illumina)

  

distance

error

error

error

Bacillus halodurans & Bacillus subtilis

1:1

Species

6.48

1.05

1.38

Gluconobacter oxydans&

1:1

Genus

3.39

4.72

4.92

Granulibacter bethesdensis

     

Escherichia coli & Yersinia pestis

1:1

Genus

10.00

3.11

2.58

Methanocaldococcus jannaschii &

1:1

Family

0.51

0.22

0.01

Methanococcus maripaludis

     

Pyrobaculum aerophilum &

1:1

Family

0.28

1.05

0.01

Thermofilum pendens

     

Gluconobacter oxydans &

1:1

Order

0.98

4.74

0.01

Rhodospirillum rubrum

     

Gluconobacter oxydans,

1:1:8

Family and Order

7.7

-

6.45

Granulibacter bethesdensis &

     

Nitrobacter hamburgensis

     

Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas putida &

1:1:8

Order and

1.96

-

0.15

Bacillus anthracis

 

Phylum

   

Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas putida,

1:1:

Species, Order,

4.52

-

0.80

Thermofilum pendens,

1:1:

Family,

   

Pyrobaculum aerophilum,

2:14

Phylum, and

   

Bacillus anthracis & Bacillus subtilis

 

Kingdom

   
  1. Note that some datasets involve genomes separated at several different taxonomic levels.
Back to article page

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

ISSN: 1748-7188