Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Table 4 The basic information of results of different methods based on AlingNemo’s dataset

From: Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison

Methods	Yeast-fly
	Conserved pairs	Yeast		Fly
	Conserved pairs	Distinct complexes (size ≥2)	Avg size	Distinct complexes (size ≥2)	Avg size
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4)	126	126	8.02	126	17.13
UEDAMAlignCMC	127	127	10.57	127	23.39
UEDAMAlignCoach	1,019	1,019	9.34	1,019	18.6
UEDAMAlignknowncomplex	160	160	4.04	156	8.65
UEDAMAlignMCL	697	697	6.26	696	5.35
AlignNemo	248	243	9.27	246	10.06
AlignMCL	684	523	3.63	630	12.92

Methods	Human-fly
	Conserved pairs	Human		Fly
	Conserved pairs	Distinct complexes (size ≥2)	Avg size	Distinct complexes (size ≥2)	Avg size
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4)	116	116	9.74	114	8.86
UEDAMAlignCMC	288	288	9.86	287	9.24
UEDAMAlignCoach	2,978	2,978	14.82	2,968	13.98
UEDAMAlignknowncomplex	333	333	4	312	3.98
UEDAMAlignMCL	679	679	3.45	677	3.11
AlignNemo	114	114	12.27	114	11.94
AlignMCL	732	732	4.68	729	4.18

Back to article page

ISSN: 1748-7188

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com