Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of FlexProt, FATCAT, FlexSnapF, and .

From: FlexSnap: Flexible Non-sequential Protein Structure Alignment

  

FlexProt

FATCAT

FlexSnapF

Pro1

Pro2

l

r

T

l

r

T

l

r

T

l

r

T

1wdnA(223)

1gggA(220)

218

0.94

2

220

1.01

2

220

0.96

2

220

0.96

2

1hpbP(238)

1gggA(220)

220

2.34

2

213

1.59

2

211

1.67

2

210

3.88

1

2bbmA(148)

1cll_(144)

139

2.22

1

144

2.28

1

138

1.8

1

138

1.80

1

2bbmA(148)

1top_(162)

147

2.40

3

145

2.28

3

137

1.78

3

137

1.78

3

1akeA(214)

2ak3A(226)

200

2.44

2

202

1.54

2

207

2.05

2

206

6.72

1

2ak3A(226)

1uke_(193)

182

2.90

2

188

2.97

0

184

2.36

1

184

3.08

0

1mcpL(220)

4fabL(219)

218

1.93

1

217

1.40

1

217

1.49

1

217

1.49

1

1mcpL(220)

1tcrB(237)

212

2.33

1

213

2.20

1

202

2.3

1

200

2.38

1

1lfh (691)

1lfg_(691)

691

1.41

2

686

0.89

2

688

0.99

2

688

0.99

2

1tfd (294)

1lfh_(691)

291

1.98

2

290

1.37

2

287

1.89

2

283

1.41

2

1b9wA(91)

1danL(142)

75

2.78

1

80

2.39

2

82

2.25

2

83

2.7

2

1qf6A(641)

1adjA(420)

323

4.43

1

351

2.68

1

326

2.45

3

320

2.47

2

2clrA(275)

3fruA(269)

253

2.71

2

245

3.06

0

254

2.57

3

252

4.31

0

1fmk (438)

1qcfA(450)

424

1.25

2

433

2.27

0

413

2.71

0

413

2.44

1

1fmk (438)

1tkiA(321)

231

3.28

2

238

3.07

0

241

2.58

3

242

3.14

2

1a21A(194)

1hwgC(191)

163

2.75

4

153

3.16

1

156

2.35

3

155

3.79

2

  1. Comparison of FlexProt, FATCAT, FlexSnapF, and . Each alignment is reported in the following format: its length, l, its rmsd, r, and the number of hinges introduced, T.