Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Comparison of FlexProt, FATCAT, FlexSnapF, and .

From: FlexSnap: Flexible Non-sequential Protein Structure Alignment

   FlexProt FATCAT FlexSnapF
Pro1 Pro2 l r T l r T l r T l r T
1wdnA(223) 1gggA(220) 218 0.94 2 220 1.01 2 220 0.96 2 220 0.96 2
1hpbP(238) 1gggA(220) 220 2.34 2 213 1.59 2 211 1.67 2 210 3.88 1
2bbmA(148) 1cll_(144) 139 2.22 1 144 2.28 1 138 1.8 1 138 1.80 1
2bbmA(148) 1top_(162) 147 2.40 3 145 2.28 3 137 1.78 3 137 1.78 3
1akeA(214) 2ak3A(226) 200 2.44 2 202 1.54 2 207 2.05 2 206 6.72 1
2ak3A(226) 1uke_(193) 182 2.90 2 188 2.97 0 184 2.36 1 184 3.08 0
1mcpL(220) 4fabL(219) 218 1.93 1 217 1.40 1 217 1.49 1 217 1.49 1
1mcpL(220) 1tcrB(237) 212 2.33 1 213 2.20 1 202 2.3 1 200 2.38 1
1lfh (691) 1lfg_(691) 691 1.41 2 686 0.89 2 688 0.99 2 688 0.99 2
1tfd (294) 1lfh_(691) 291 1.98 2 290 1.37 2 287 1.89 2 283 1.41 2
1b9wA(91) 1danL(142) 75 2.78 1 80 2.39 2 82 2.25 2 83 2.7 2
1qf6A(641) 1adjA(420) 323 4.43 1 351 2.68 1 326 2.45 3 320 2.47 2
2clrA(275) 3fruA(269) 253 2.71 2 245 3.06 0 254 2.57 3 252 4.31 0
1fmk (438) 1qcfA(450) 424 1.25 2 433 2.27 0 413 2.71 0 413 2.44 1
1fmk (438) 1tkiA(321) 231 3.28 2 238 3.07 0 241 2.58 3 242 3.14 2
1a21A(194) 1hwgC(191) 163 2.75 4 153 3.16 1 156 2.35 3 155 3.79 2
  1. Comparison of FlexProt, FATCAT, FlexSnapF, and . Each alignment is reported in the following format: its length, l, its rmsd, r, and the number of hinges introduced, T.