Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of FlexSnap and FlexProt on the DynDom pairs for which rigid alignment methods returned coverage ≤ 60%

From: FlexSnap: Flexible Non-sequential Protein Structure Alignment

Rigid Alignment

FlexSnap

FlexProt

Method

#Pairs

aC (%)/ aR (Ã…)

aC (%)/ aR (Ã…)/ aH

aC (%)/ aR (Ã…)/ aH

DALI

30

31/2.3

89/1.75/1.37

79/2.36/1.37

Structal

282

52/0.77

94/1.72/1.34

93/2.08/1.34

MultiProt

164

53/1.12

92/1.59/1.56

93/2.0/1.56

  1. Two values are reported for the alignments of each method: average coverage for the method (aC in %), and average rmsd (aR in Ã…). For FlexSnap and FlexProt, we also report the average number of hinges introduced (aH).
Back to article page

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

ISSN: 1748-7188