Skip to main content

Table 1 Prediction accuracy of competitive RNA-RNA joint secondary structure prediction methods.

From: Fast prediction of RNA-RNA interaction

 

Sensitivity

PPV

F-measure

RNA-RNA interaction pairs

inRNAs

EBM

SPM

LM

inRNAs

EBM

SPM

LM

inRNAs

EBM

SPM

LM

CopA-CopT

1.000

0.909

0.955

0.864

0.846

0.800

0.778

0.760

0.917

0.851

0.857

0.809

DIS-DIS

1.000

0.786

0.786

0.786

1.000

0.786

0.786

0.786

1.000

0.786

0.786

0.786

IncRNA54-RepZ

0.875

0.917

0.875

0.875

0.792

0.830

0.778

0.778

0.831

0.871

0.824

0.824

R1inv-R2inv

0.900

0.900

1.000

1.000

0.900

0.947

1.000

1.000

0.900

0.923

1.000

1.000

Tar-Tar*

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.875

0.933

0.875

0.875

0.933

0.965

0.933

0.933

Average

0.955

0.902

0.923

0.905

0.883

0.859

0.843

0.840

0.916

0.879

0.880

0.870

  1. This Table shows the sensitivity, PPV and F-measure for RNA-RNA joint secondary structure prediction by (1) inRNAs, (2) the grammatical approach by Kato et al. [13] (denoted by EBM as energy-based model), and (3) the DP methods for two models presented by Alkan et al. [1] (denoted by SPM as stacked-pair model and LM as loop model). The dataset is compiled by Kato et al. [13].