Skip to main content

Table 4 Results for FC with H = 250 and p = 80% on the Benchmark 2 datasets

From: Speeding up the Consensus Clustering methodology for microarray data analysis

 

Precision

Timing

 

Novartis

St.Jude

Normal

Gaussian3

Gaussian5

Simulated6

Novartis

St.Jude

Normal

Hier-A

⑤ - 6

➏

10

➌

➎

⑤

4.0 × 105

1.6 × 106

3.4 × 105

Hier-C

➍ - ⑤

⑤ - ➏

10

➌

➎

⑤

3.9 × 105

1.4 × 106

3.3 × 105

Hier-S

⑤

2

10

②

2

⑦

4.4 × 105

1.5 × 106

3.4 × 105

K-means-R

⑤

➏

10

➌

➎

➏

1.4 × 107

5.9 × 106

2.0 × 106

K-means-A

⑤ - 6

➏

8

➌

➎

⑤

5.5 × 106

3.2 × 107

5.4 × 106

K-means-C

➍ - ⑤

⑤ - ➏

10

➌

➎

⑤

6.5 × 106

3.2 × 107

2.1 × 106

K-means-S

⑤

➏

10

②

➎

➏

7.8 × 106

4.9 × 107

2.1 × 106

Gold solution

4

6

13

3

5

6

-

-

-

  1. A summary of the results for FC with H = 250 and p = 80%, on all algorithms, except NMF, and for the datasets in Benchmark 2. The table legend is as in Table 1. NMF has been excluded since each experiment was terminated due to its high computational demand. The timing results for the artificial datasets are not reported since the experiments have been performed on a computer other than the AMD Athlon.
Back to article page

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

ISSN: 1748-7188