Skip to main content


Figure 3 | Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Figure 3

From: An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods

Figure 3

Scaffold density vs. 4 best supertree methods' FN rate. Topological error rates on mixed datasets, without PhySIC and SFIT (which had higher error rates). We report False Negative (FN) rates (means with standard error bars) for gMRP, MinFlip, RFS, Q-Imp, and QMC(Exp+TSQ), as a function of the scaffold density, for 100-, 500-, and 1000-taxon model conditions.

Back to article page