A normalization strategy for comparing tag count data

Table 2 Estimated values for P_DEG and P_A by TbT.

	True P_A = 50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
	(a) Estimated P_DEG (%)
P_DEG = 5%	5.65	5.44	5.68	5.61	5.67	5.54
10%	9.38	9.39	9.58	9.28	9.54	9.31
20%	17.14	17.41	17.21	17.22	17.11	17.01
30%	25.47	25.19	24.87	25.15	24.61	24.34
	(b) Estimated P_A (%)
5%	49.44	55.08	59.55	65.56	70.02	74.35
10%	50.66	56.27	61.64	67.47	73.98	79.51
20%	49.62	57.41	63.67	69.17	75.49	82.30
30%	50.05	56.58	63.34	70.08	72.47	76.05
	(c) Sensitivity
5%	62.17	59.53	62.13	62.06	61.79	60.32
10%	63.61	63.41	64.85	62.59	64.27	62.31
20%	67.37	68.15	67.24	66.68	65.13	63.98
30%	71.07	70.09	68.53	68.69	63.99	59.56
	(d) Specificity
5%	97.35	97.43	97.31	97.39	97.31	97.37
10%	96.70	96.67	96.62	96.69	96.60	96.64
20%	95.53	95.39	95.40	95.26	95.01	94.84
30%	94.25	94.22	94.00	93.67	92.42	90.89
	(e) Accuracy
5%	95.58	95.52	95.54	95.61	95.52	95.50
10%	93.36	93.31	93.42	93.26	93.34	93.17
20%	89.86	89.90	89.73	89.50	88.99	88.62
30%	87.25	86.94	86.32	86.13	83.84	81.43

Average estimates of total of 100 trials for (a) P_DEG and (b) P_A. The (c) sensitivity, (d) specificity, and (e) accuracy for the estimation are also shown.

ISSN: 1748-7188