Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 The basic information of results of different methods

From: Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison

Method Yeast-fly
Conserved pairs Yeast Fly
Distinct complex (size ≥2) Avg size Distinct complex (size ≥2) Avg size
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k=4) 129 129 7.48 129 10.72
UEDAMAlignCMC 128 128 9.65 128 12.89
UEDAMAlignCoach 725 725 5.84 723 4.32
UEDAMAlignknowncomplex 148 148 3.92 146 5.12
UEDAMAlignMCL 862 862 3.16 861 3.23
AlignMCL 933 915 3.22 927 3.79
Match-and-Split 27 27 4.63 27 6.85
Mawish 41 41 2.34 40 3.55
NetworkBlast 191 179 9.12 191 10.86
Produles 95 46 4.09 46 4.39
Methods Human-fly
Conserved pairs Human Fly
Distinct complexes (size ≥2) Avg size Distinct complexes (size ≥2) Avg size
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4) 238 238 9.38 235 8.31
UEDAMAlignCMC 404 404 9.39 404 8.69
UEDAMAlignCoach 1,538 1,538 5.96 1,519 5.51
UEDAMAlignknowncomplex 515 515 4.11 510 4.48
UEDAMAlignMCL 1,453 1,453 3.77 1,450 3.2
AlignMCL 1,117 1,094 3.25 1,068 3.31
Match-and-Split 53 53 5.26 53 3.83
Mawish 65 61 2.59 55 2.22
NetworkBlast 164 164 9.01 158 7.6
Produles 187 99 3.77 91 3.41