Skip to main content

Table 1 The basic information of results of different methods

From: Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison

Method

Yeast-fly

Conserved pairs

Yeast

Fly

Distinct complex (size ≥2)

Avg size

Distinct complex (size ≥2)

Avg size

UEDAMAlignCFinder (k=4)

129

129

7.48

129

10.72

UEDAMAlignCMC

128

128

9.65

128

12.89

UEDAMAlignCoach

725

725

5.84

723

4.32

UEDAMAlignknowncomplex

148

148

3.92

146

5.12

UEDAMAlignMCL

862

862

3.16

861

3.23

AlignMCL

933

915

3.22

927

3.79

Match-and-Split

27

27

4.63

27

6.85

Mawish

41

41

2.34

40

3.55

NetworkBlast

191

179

9.12

191

10.86

Produles

95

46

4.09

46

4.39

Methods

Human-fly

Conserved pairs

Human

Fly

Distinct complexes (size ≥2)

Avg size

Distinct complexes (size ≥2)

Avg size

UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4)

238

238

9.38

235

8.31

UEDAMAlignCMC

404

404

9.39

404

8.69

UEDAMAlignCoach

1,538

1,538

5.96

1,519

5.51

UEDAMAlignknowncomplex

515

515

4.11

510

4.48

UEDAMAlignMCL

1,453

1,453

3.77

1,450

3.2

AlignMCL

1,117

1,094

3.25

1,068

3.31

Match-and-Split

53

53

5.26

53

3.83

Mawish

65

61

2.59

55

2.22

NetworkBlast

164

164

9.01

158

7.6

Produles

187

99

3.77

91

3.41