Table 3 Comparison in terms of biological relevance between each pair of conserved protein complexes predicted by each method
Methods | Yeast-fly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conserved pairs | \(Avg\_mixed\) | \(Avg\_yeast\) | \(Avg\_fly\) | \(Avg\_intra\) | |
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4) | 129 | 3.96 | 5.3766 | 3.4259 | 3.7503 |
UEDAMAlignCMC | 128 | 3.5266 | 4.9468 | 2.9469 | 3.3061 |
UEDAMAlignCoach | 725 | 3.4729 | 4.4809 | 2.5707 | 3.1565 |
UEDAMAlignKnownComplex | 148 | 4.5041 | 7.0767 | 3.7421 | 3.9779 |
UEDAMAlignMCL | 862 | 2.3539 | 3.2412 | 1.4475 | 2.3063 |
AlignMCL | 933 | 2.2563 | 2.9469 | 1.255 | 2.2319 |
Match-and-Split | 27 | 4.069 | 5.7868 | 3.3512 | 3.614 |
Mawish | 41 | 4.4942 | 5.9584 | 3.7828 | 4.2566 |
NetworkBlast | 191 | 2.2865 | 2.8698 | 1.8388 | 2.198 |
Produles | 95 | 3.4301 | 6.3427 | 2.525 | 2.8541 |
Methods | Human-fly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conserved pairs | \(Avg\_mixed\) | \(Avg\_human\) | \(Avg\_fly\) | \(Avg\_intra\) | |
UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4) | 238 | 3.7826 | 4.0948 | 3.7551 | 3.6892 |
UEDAMAlignCMC | 404 | 3.5078 | 4.0341 | 3.2929 | 3.3612 |
UEDAMAlignCoach | 1,538 | 3.5807 | 4.0532 | 3.3599 | 3.4388 |
UEDAMAlignKnownComplex | 515 | 4.8490 | 6.1202 | 4.4131 | 4.5720 |
UEDAMAlignMCL | 1,453 | 2.2718 | 2.4197 | 1.905 | 2.2812 |
AlignMCL | 1,117 | 2.4166 | 2.5095 | 1.7317 | 2.456 |
Match-and-Split | 53 | 4.0713 | 4.484 | 4.6043 | 3.7865 |
Mawish | 65 | 4.424 | 4.8343 | 4.9263 | 4.1549 |
NetworkBlast | 164 | 3.3956 | 3.7568 | 3.3467 | 3.2386 |
Produles | 187 | 3.8828 | 4.3098 | 4.2651 | 3.7342 |