Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Comparison of different methods in terms of how well matching with known protein based one AlignNemo’s dataset

From: Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison

Methods PC MPC MKC Recall Precision F-measure CR PM
Yeast-fly
 UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4) 126 62 66 0.1535 0.4921 0.234 0.1682 2
 UEDAMAlignCMC 127 57 74 0.1458 0.4488 0.2201 0.2208 0
 UEDAMAlignCoach 1,019 190 134 0.4095 0.1865 0.2562 0.288 0
 UEDAMAlignknowncomplex 160 158 184 0.4136 0.9875 0.583 0.3745 47
 UEDAMAlignMCL 697 113 115 0.2783 0.1621 0.2049 0.2365 4
 AlignNemo 243 77 53 0.1782 0.3169 0.2281 0.1755 0
 AlignMCL 523 95 97 0.234 0.1816 0.2045 0.2224 5
Human-fly
 UEDAMAlignCFinder (k = 4) 116 42 67 0.0264 0.3621 0.0493 0.0451 1
 UEDAMAlignCMC 288 62 101 0.0394 0.2153 0.0666 0.1251 1
 UEDAMAlignCoach 2,978 432 281 0.2449 0.1451 0.1822 0.1945 0
 UEDAMAlignknowncomplex 333 326 552 0.235 0.979 0.3791 0.2634 34
 UEDAMAlignMCL 679 103 219 0.0688 0.1517 0.0947 0.1459 2
 AlignNemo 114 31 48 0.0194 0.2719 0.0363 0.0628 0
 AlignMCL 732 97 254 0.0666 0.1325 0.0887 0.2012 2