Table 7 Comparison of performance of UEDAMAlignKnownComplex and UEDAMAlignCoach with respect to various values of parameter l and r on how well matching with known protein
Methods | PC | MPC | MKC | Recall | Precision | F-measure | CR | PM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yeast-fly | ||||||||
  \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=2\) | 725 | 207 | 129 | 0.4259 | 0.2855 | 0.3419 | 0.3057 | 4 |
  \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=3\) | 762 | 214 | 144 | 0.4477 | 0.2808 | 0.3452 | 0.3078 | 4 |
  \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=2\) | 785 | 217 | 142 | 0.4493 | 0.2764 | 0.3423 | 0.3078 | 4 |
  \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=3\) | 785 | 218 | 144 | 0.4523 | 0.2777 | 0.3441 | 0.3078 | 4 |
  \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=2\) | 148 | 145 | 172 | 0.3806 | 0.9797 | 0.5482 | 0.3432 | 45 |
  \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=3\) | 149 | 146 | 173 | 0.3832 | 0.9799 | 0.5509 | 0.3453 | 46 |
  \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=2\) | 148 | 145 | 172 | 0.3806 | 0.9797 | 0.5482 | 0.3432 | 45 |
  \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=3\) | 149 | 146 | 173 | 0.3832 | 0.9799 | 0.5509 | 0.3453 | 46 |
Human-fly | ||||||||
 \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=2\) | 1,538 | 428 | 493 | 0.2765 | 0.2783 | 0.2774 | 0.2983 | 10 |
 \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=3\) | 1,420 | 410 | 474 | 0.2647 | 0.2887 | 0.2762 | 0.2963 | 9 |
 \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=2\) | 1,421 | 401 | 469 | 0.2595 | 0.2822 | 0.2704 | 0.2965 | 9 |
 \(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=3\) | 1,430 | 406 | 473 | 0.2626 | 0.2839 | 0.2728 | 0.2965 | 9 |
 \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=2\) | 515 | 508 | 821 | 0.3908 | 0.9864 | 0.5598 | 0.4242 | 158 |
 \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=3\) | 521 | 514 | 826 | 0.3951 | 0.9866 | 0.5642 | 0.4269 | 158 |
 \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=2\) | 522 | 515 | 827 | 0.3958 | 0.9866 | 0.5650 | 0.4270 | 158 |
 \(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=3\) | 524 | 517 | 829 | 0.3974 | 0.9866 | 0.5666 | 0.4274 | 158 |