Table 8 Comparison in terms of biological relevance between each pair of conserved protein complexes predicted by UEDAMAlignKnownComplex and UEDAMAlignCoach with respect to various values of parameter l and r
Methods | Yeast-fly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conserved pairs | \(Avg\_mixed\) | \(Avg\_yeast\) | \(Avg\_fly\) | \(Avg\_intra\) | |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=2\) | 725 | 3.4729 | 4.4809 | 2.5707 | 3.1565 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=3\) | 762 | 3.4142 | 4.5086 | 2.6173 | 3.1450 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=2\) | 785 | 3.4591 | 4.4847 | 2.6750 | 3.2003 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=3\) | 785 | 3.4140 | 4.4826 | 2.6646 | 3.1738 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=2\) | 148 | 4.5041 | 7.0767 | 3.7421 | 3.9779 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=3\) | 149 | 4.3174 | 7.0879 | 3.6295 | 3.8850 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=2\) | 148 | 4.4140 | 7.0767 | 3.7057 | 3.9537 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=3\) | 149 | 4.3174 | 7.0879 | 3.6295 | 3.8850 |
Methods | Human-fly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conserved pairs | \(Avg\_mixed\) | \(Avg\_human\) | \(Avg\_fly\) | \(Avg\_intra\) | |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=2\) | 1.538 | 3.5807 | 4.0532 | 3.3599 | 3.4388 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=2\_r=3\) | 1.420 | 3.6842 | 4.1654 | 3.4326 | 3.5286 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=2\) | 1.421 | 3.6766 | 4.1517 | 3.4409 | 3.5189 |
\(UEDAMAlignCoach\_l=3\_r=3\) | 1.430 | 3.6762 | 4.1506 | 3.4260 | 3.5201 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=2\) | 515 | 4.8490 | 6.1202 | 4.4131 | 4.5720 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=2\_r=3\) | 521 | 4.8482 | 6.1193 | 4.4186 | 4.5767 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=2\) | 522 | 4.8567 | 6.1345 | 4.4277 | 4.5760 |
\(UEDAMAlignKnowComplex\_l=3\_r=3\) | 524 | 4.8436 | 6.1261 | 4.4142 | 4.5696 |