Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity comparison of different programs

From: Best hits of 11110110111: model-free selection and parameter-free sensitivity calculation of spaced seeds

w

p

SpEED

AcoSeed

FastHC

MuteHC

Rasbhari

Current sensitivity (\(\delta\))

10

0.75

90.9098

90.9513

90.7312

92.6812

90.9614

90.8753 (1.8059%)

0.80

97.8337

97.8521

97.7625

98.3836

97.8554

97.8203 (0.5633%)

0.85

99.7569

99.7614

99.7431

99.8356

99.7618

99.7568 (0.0788%)

11

0.75

83.3793

83.4728

83.3068

83.4127

83.4679

83.4297 (0.0431%)

0.80

94.9861

95.037

94.9453

95.0194

95.0386

95.0127 (0.0259%)

0.85

99.2431

99.2478

99.2250

99.2486

99.2506

99.2452 (0.0054%)

12

0.80

90.5750

90.6328

90.4735

90.5820

90.6648

90.5571 (0.1077%)

0.85

98.1589

98.1766

98.1199

98.1670

98.1824

98.1591 (0.0233%)

0.90

99.8821

99.8853

99.8771

99.8836

99.8864

99.8840 (0.0024%)

16

0.85

84.8212

84.9829

84.6558

84.8764

84.969

84.9668 (0.0161%)

0.90

97.4321

97.4712

97.3556

97.4460

97.5035

97.4730 (0.0305%)

0.95

99.9388

99.9419

99.9347

99.9424

99.9441

99.9414 (0.0027%)

  1. Italic values indicate the best sensitivity
  2. The reported sensitivity for \(n=4\) seeds of weight w on alignments of length \(l=50\) under a Bernoulli model with a match probability p. All the reported results are extracted from the Table 1 of [80], but the last column that corresponds to our current public seeds, with a \(\delta\) difference to the optimal seed