Skip to main content

Table 1 Brief description of the models used in our benchmarks

From: ASP-based method for the enumeration of attractors in non-deterministic synchronous and asynchronous multi-valued networks

Models

Model description

\(|\Sigma |\)

\(\max _{a\in \Sigma }\{|\mathcal {S}_a|\}\)

\(|\mathcal {T}|\)

\(|\mathcal {S}|\)

 

Example

4

3

12

36

 [31]

Lambda phage

4

4

46

48

 [32]

Trp-reg

4

3

14

36

 [33]

Fission-yeast

9

3

43

3 \(\times \) 2\(^\text {9}\) \(=\) 1536

 [34]

Mamm.

10

2

34

2\(^{10}\) \(=\) 1024

 [35]

Tcrsig

40

2

85

2\(^\text {40}\) \(\simeq \) 10\(^{12}\)

 [36]

FGF

59

3

102

2\(^\text {31}\) \(\simeq \) 1.2 \(\times \) 10\(^\text {10}\)

 [37]

T-helper

101

3

316

2\(^\text {102}\) \(\simeq \) 5.7 \(\times \) 10\(^\text {31}\)

  1. The successive lines sum up the information regarding the models of, respectively, the toy example of Fig. 1, the bacteriophage lambda [31], the tryptophan biosynthesis in E.coli regression [32], the fission yeast [33], the mammilian cell cycle [34], the TCR signalling pathway in the mammalian differentiation [35], the drosophila FGF signalling pathway [36] and the T-helper cell differentiation [37]. For each of them, the table gives the number of automata (\(|\Sigma |\)), the maximal local level in the automata (\(\max _{a\in \Sigma }\{|\mathcal {S}_a|\}\)), the number of local transitions (\(|\mathcal {T}|\)) and the number of states in the corresponding state-transition graph (\(|\mathcal {S}|\))