Skip to main content

Table 2 The number of gene trees for which OCTAL provided an improvement over ASTRAL-II, for which ASTRAL-II provided an improvement of OCTAL, and for which there was no difference between the two methods is provided below for two levels of ILS and four numbers of genes

From: OCTAL: Optimal Completion of gene trees in polynomial time

Number of genes

OCTAL better

ASTRAL-II better

No difference

Moderate ILS (AD = 10%)

 25 genes

177

62

161

 50 genes

420

116

262

 100 genes

685

188

627

 200 genes

1366

363

1271

High ILS (AD = 35%)

 25 genes

228

79

93

 50 genes

398

119

283

 100 genes

624

265

611

 200 genes

1004

524

1472

  1. The RF error rate is used for evaluating the distance between the completed, estimated trees and the true gene trees. Numbers in italic indicate the largest number of genes. OCTAL improves more genes than ASTRAL-II except when the level of ILS is high and the number of genes is 200, in which case OCTAL and ASTRAL-II are more often equal in their performance