GrpClassifierEC: a novel classification approach based on the ensemble clustering space

Table 3 GrpClassifierEC: -EC classifier results with a k value of 49 compared to Random forest applied on the EC samples and results for regular classifiers applied on the original data (K is number of clusters)

Data/performance	Data info			EC classifier GrpClassifierEC				Accuracy difference				EC-RF			Regular classifiers
Data/performance	#Point	#EC_Samples	Ratio	Sensitivity	Specificity	F-measure	Accuracy	EC random forest	Random forest	DTT	KNN	Sensitivity	Specificity	Accuracy	AccDT	AccKNN	AccRF
Aves vs embryophyta	1068	726	68%	0.97	0.92	0.97	0.96	0.02	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.84	0.97	0.93	0.91	0.93	0.95
Cercopithecidae vs Malvaceae	894	593	66%	0.98	0.97	0.98	0.98	0.08	0.05	0.10	0.07	0.84	0.94	0.90	0.88	0.91	0.93
Embryophyta vs Laurasiatheria	953	652	68%	0.96	0.92	0.96	0.95	0.08	0.04	0.10	0.07	0.94	0.72	0.87	0.85	0.88	0.91
Fabaceae vs Nematoda	2642	1004	38%	0.85	0.89	0.84	0.87	0.02	-0.01	0.04	0.00	0.92	0.76	0.85	0.83	0.88	0.89
Hexapoda vs Aves	2840	2087	73%	0.85	0.95	0.86	0.92	0.10	0.03	0.11	0.10	0.61	0.91	0.83	0.81	0.82	0.89
Laurasiatheria vs Brassicaceae	1209	570	47%	0.93	0.93	0.94	0.93	0.05	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.86	0.90	0.88	0.89	0.91	0.92
Malvaceae vs Fabaceae	1401	749	53%	0.69	0.87	0.68	0.82	0.16	0.05	0.15	0.12	0.84	0.22	0.67	0.67	0.70	0.77
brassicaceae vs Hexapoda	2584	870	34%	0.84	0.96	0.84	0.93	0.02	0.00	0.03	0.01	0.97	0.74	0.92	0.90	0.93	0.94
Hominidae vs Cercopithecidae	1829	1059	58%	0.72	0.91	0.73	0.86	0.15	0.09	0.20	0.14	0.25	0.87	0.70	0.66	0.71	0.76
Monocotyledons vs HomoSapiens	2625	1460	56%	0.92	0.93	0.92	0.92	0.10	0.03	0.09	0.04	0.84	0.82	0.83	0.83	0.88	0.89
Average			56%	87%	92%	87%	91%	8%	3%	9%	6%	79%	78%	84%	82%	85%	89%

ISSN: 1748-7188